Apple App Store rejections surge due to privacy concerns. The number of apps built for the Apple ecosystem, which try to obtain too much sensitive user information or violate user privacy in other ways, is growing exponentially year after year. According to a new report from Atlas VPN, Apple declined almost a million apps from appearing on the App Store between 2020 and 2022 (958,000). This article explores the reasons behind these rejections and sheds light on the increasing concerns surrounding user privacy in the Apple ecosystem.
Contents
Apple’s App Store Rejections
Atlas VPN’s report reveals that Apple blocked 215,000 applications in 2020 and 400,000 in 2021, marking an alarming increase of nearly 100%. The primary reason for these rejections stems from user privacy concerns. Many apps were found to collect more data than necessary or share it with third parties without proper disclosure or user consent. Additionally, some apps posed financial threats to users, prompting Apple to prevent fraudulent transactions worth billions of dollars and block millions of stolen credit cards.
User Vulnerability and App Permissions
Hackers often prey on Apple users because many users lack a comprehensive understanding of the impact certain apps may have on their privacy. Annoyed by constant prompts for permissions, users tend to accept all without realizing the potential consequences. Consequently, app developers gain access to sensitive information even if users did not intend to provide it, irrespective of the developers’ intentions being malicious or not.
App Data Monetization
Apps generate a treasure trove of important data that developers can easily monetize. Unlike Google’s Android ecosystem, which embraces third-party app stores, Apple maintains a walled-garden approach to protect customers from malicious developers. This article explores the motivations behind app developers monetizing user data and highlights the financial gains associated with such practices.
Apple’s Walled-Garden Approach
Apple’s insistence on a walled-garden approach aims to safeguard user privacy and security. The comparison between Apple’s approach and Android’s openness to third-party app stores is discussed, along with the rationale behind Apple’s preference. Additionally, the article sheds light on Apple’s 30% commission on most app purchases, emphasizing the financial benefits it brings for Apple and its developers.
2 Comments